[This is an exerpt from a book I'm writing on social justice in the Old Testament.]
Up
until very recent times, the economy in the land of Israel was primarily
agricultural. This was especially true in biblical times. The Bible is replete
with references to sowing, reaping, threshing, and milling; and to vineyards
and olive groves. The annual harvests of grain, olives, and grapes represented
a significant portion, if not the majority, of national economic production. In
Deuteronomy 8:8, Moses describes the land of Israel as “a land with wheat and
barley, vines and fig trees, pomegranates, olive oil and honey.”
In
addition to comprising a major part of the national economy, grain was an essential
dietary staple that played an important role in people’s everyday lives. Each
morning, women ground grain by hand for that day’s bread.[1]
When Jesus taught His disciples to pray, “Give us each day our daily bread,” He
used the bread baked each morning to symbolize God’s provision for His people.
He emphasized the daily aspect of bread making, recalling the bread called manna that God provided for the
Israelites after they escaped from Egypt into the wilderness. The Book of
Exodus says manna fell with the dew each morning like thin flakes of frost, and
was colored white like coriander seed, and tasted like wafers made with honey.
Each morning, the Israelites gathered a daily supply of manna, which they would
prepare by baking or boiling it. Any manna stored overnight would rot by
morning.
The
Israelites who listened to Moses relay God’s instructions at the foot of Mount
Sinai well understood the daily necessity of manna, the bread from heaven—they
had likely gathered and baked cakes of manna that very morning and had eaten
them that day. But now, looking forward to the time when the Israelites had
established themselves in the Promise Land, God instructed the Israelites to
provide grain and other staple crops for poor and vulnerable groups in society.
When
you reap the harvest of your land, do not reap to the very edges of your field
or gather the gleanings of your harvest. Do not go over your vineyard a second
time or pick up the grapes that have fallen. Leave them for the poor and the
alien. I am the LORD your God.[2]
Forty
years later, in Deuteronomy, Moses characteristically expands on the command
given in Leviticus.
When
you are harvesting in your field and you overlook a sheaf, do not go back to
get it. Leave it for the alien, the fatherless, and the widow, so that the LORD
your God may bless you in all the work of your hands. When you beat the olives
from your trees, do not go over the branches a second time. Leave what remains
for the alien, the fatherless, and the widow. When you harvest the grapes in
your vineyard, do not go over the vines again. Leave what remains for the
alien, the fatherless, and the widow. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt.
That is why I command you to do this.[3]
Moses
told the Israelites not to harvest to the extreme edges of their fields, nor to
go over their fields a second time to pick up what was left over after the
harvesters had bundled the sheaves of grain. In the same way, Moses prohibited
the Israelites from beating their olive trees a second time or returning to
recover what fruit remained after picking their grapes from the vine.
Moses
gave several reasons for this instruction. First, the remaining grain, olives,
and grapes would provide sustenance and gainful employment for people who lived
on society’s margins: poor immigrants, orphans, and widows. The Book of Ruth
provides an imperfect but instructive example of how this worked. One of the
book’s major protagonists, Ruth, is both a widow and an immigrant who lived in
Israel during the time of the judges, before any monarchy was established. As
the author of the Book of Judges repeatedly notes, “In those days, Israel had
no king; everyone did as he saw fit.” A cursory reading of Judges depicts a
brutish, lawless, and predatory society. Fortunately for Ruth, she immigrated
to Bethlehem in Judah, where some people followed the instruction that God had
given to the Israelites, including a noble landowner named Boaz. She arrived
just as the barley harvest was beginning and travelled out of the town and into
the fields to see if she could glean from an amiable landowner. As it happened,
Ruth found herself gleaning behind the harvesters in the field of Boaz. It is
worthwhile to note what Boaz tells Ruth when they first meet.
So
Boaz said to Ruth, “My daughter, listen to me. Don’t go and glean in another
field and don’t go away from here. Stay here with my servant girls. Watch the
field where the men are harvesting, and follow along after the girls. I have
told the men not to touch you.”[4]
Boaz
implies that Ruth would not be welcome in some fields, or worse, that evil men
would mistreat or kidnap a lone woman found in the countryside. This was wise
advice given the social degradation in Israel at the time. Ruth’s mother-in-law
reinforces Boaz’s warning, saying, “It will be good for you, my daughter, to go
with his girls, because in someone else’s field you might be harmed.”[5]
In the midst of lawlessness, Boaz faithfully followed the Mosaic Law, allowing
Ruth to gather food for herself and her mother-in-law. And, because of Boaz’s
obedience, Ruth had a respectable way of earning a living. The Bible says that
after working from morning till evening and threshing the barely she had
gathered, it measured approximately 20 quarts or 22 liters—a substantial amount
that would feed her small family for some time. In addition, Ruth and her
mother-in-law could use the barley to barter for necessary goods, as was common
in the ancient world without an easily accessible standard of currency.[6]
According
to Moses, the second reason for God’s instruction was to ensure God’s blessing.
Leave something behind, Moses told the Israelite landowners, “so that the LORD
your God may bless you in all the work of your hands.” By purposefully refusing
to take maximum profits during the harvest, the owner of the field, grove, or
vineyard would realize even greater profitability from their enterprise. God’s
message here is counterintuitive unless put into the context of God’s covenant
with His people Israel. God called the Israelites out of Egypt so that He could
make them a nation that reflected His just, loving, and holy character. If
Israelite society functioned according to God’s moral precepts, they would
receive His blessing.
You
have decreed this day that the LORD is your God and that you will walk in his
ways, that you will keep his decrees, commands and laws, and that you will obey
him. And the LORD has declared this day that you are his people, his treasured
possession as he promised, and that you are to keep all his commands. He has
declared that he will set you in praise, fame and honor high above all the
nations he has made and that you will be a people holy to the LORD your God, as
he promised.[7]
So,
although the gleaning provision was wasteful from an individual point of view,
it was very efficient in terms of accomplishing God’s purposes for Israelite
society, specifically His desire for justice which includes salvation for the
weak and oppressed. Moreover, God promised supernatural fruitfulness for the
individual landowner so that he would receive more than he gave up. As Proverbs
11:24-25 reads, “One person gives freely, yet gains even more; another
withholds unduly, but comes to poverty. A generous person will prosper; whoever
refreshes others will be refreshed.”
Today,
Christians can make similar economic choices that may seem somewhat inefficient
from an individualistic point of view, but are efficient from the standpoint of
seeing justice done in society. When purchasing a product or service, we should
not seek the best price and value, but also take into consideration the
business practices of the companies that we buy from. We should be aware of the
effects of our purchases on others, especially the poor and vulnerable. Is your
laptop assembled in factories that treat their workers poorly for the sake of
profit? Does the disposable electronic toy you bought for your nephew contain
raw metals mined from strip mines that destroy forests and pollute rivers?
In
today’s hyper-efficient market economy, Christian consumers need to
conscientiously leave some margin for the sustenance and gainful employment of
vulnerable people by purchasing products and services from companies that
operate in a responsible manner. Companies exist to make a profit, not to
follow ethical rules. Left to themselves, companies will maximize profits any
way possible. It is the responsibility of consumers to give companies a profit
incentive in operating responsibly, even compassionately.
The
third reason Moses gave for leaving a portion of the crop for those who needed
it was because the Israelites had themselves been in a helpless, hopeless
situation. Many of the Israelites camped at the foot of Mount Sinai listening
to Moses likely bore scars laid on them by their Egyptian taskmasters. Because
the God of justice “heard their cry” and saved them from oppression, they now
enjoyed freedom unknown to generations before them. God also called them out
into the desert where he fed them with manna each morning and quail each
evening, teaching them to trust in the God of mercy and grace for everything in
life.
Moses
reminded the Israelites of the justice and mercy they received from God:
“Remember that you were slaves in Egypt. That is why I command you to do this.”
Likewise, the Israelites should act with justice and mercy toward weak,
vulnerable, and oppressed people in their midst. In the same way that God saved
them from cruel slavery, the Israelites could help save poor immigrants,
widows, and orphans from danger and wicked people, just as Boaz saved Ruth. In
the same way God provided manna for the Israelites in the desert, the
Israelites could provide sustenance and gainful employment for those who needed
it by following God’s harvesting instructions.
[1]
This is the reason why God prohibited the Israelites from taking millstones as
debt collateral in Deuteronomy 24:6, “Do not take a pair of millstones—not even
the upper one—as security for a debt, because that would be taking a man’s
livelihood as security.”
[2]
Leviticus 19:9-10, see
also 23:22
[3]
Deuteronomy 24:19-22
[4]
Ruth 2:8
[5]
Ruth 2:22
[6]
Israel did not use a currency until after the Exile.
[7]
Deuteronomy 26:17-19
[This post is an excerpt of my work-in-progress book on social justice in the Old Testament. Feedback is welcome! More on Learning to Do Right.]
1 comment:
This is a very good teaching. I wish many in America who call themselves Christians would look at this biblical concept of gleaning. I hear more and more churches putting down the poor and ask why should their tax dollars (notice I say tax dollars and not their tithes) go to feed the poor? they say that they are poor because they want to be and they need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and get a job. But that does not apply to the widow, the poor, and the fatherless. I don't remember the Bible asking for people's tax records to determined if they were poor enough to glean their fields. The Bible says that Jesus and His disciples gleaned a field of grain on the Sabbath. The Pharisees even rebuked them for working (picking grain) on the Sabbath, but not for gleaning itself, but for doing it on the Sabbath. We have a responsibility as believers to help those who are hungry and thirsty (Matt 25, James 1) and not worry that a few of our tax dollars are going to help the same people Jesus told us to help. This is something not taught in the church. Thanks and God bless.
Post a Comment